Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 4:57:11 GMT -5
Abe signed and accepted by the appeal committee e the appeal settlement report containing the commissions observations and the proposal to acceptreject the appeal will be submitted to the analysis and vote of the management structure of the authorized agency. The appeal settlement report is a public document f the deadline for resolving appeals is calendar days from the date of registration of the appeal at the authorized agency. Art. . The experts who are part of the appeals assessment and settlement committees must comply with the legal provisions in force regarding incompatibilities integrity and conflicts of interest as well as the provisions of the codes of ethics of the authorized agency.
CNATDCU CNCS respectively of the representative Country Email List student federations at the level national. The same conditions apply to the people who are part of the structures that participate in the evaluation and decisionmaking process for the purpose of accreditation periodic evaluation of doctoral schools. Art. . The external evaluation for the authorization accreditation and periodic evaluation of a doctoral school will cover in a systemic approach as the case may be the following aspects a the academic relevance of the doctoral school as an.
Entry mechanism including the attractiveness and visibility of the scientific and artistic creationsports performance of the doctoral school expressed by the number of candidates from the country and abroad relative to the number of places offered for competition within the school b institutional capacity as a state mechanism including at least the analysis of the quality of the human resource in the doctoral school by field of the programs and the research infrastructure in the doctoral school c institutional effectiveness as an exit of the human resource generated by the doctoral program and the doctoral schools contribution to scientific knowledgeartistic creationsports performance d quality management as a transversal mechanism including mandatory compliance with ethics integrity and transparency norms and deontological provisions. Art. . The doctoral school and the doctoral supervisor.
CNATDCU CNCS respectively of the representative Country Email List student federations at the level national. The same conditions apply to the people who are part of the structures that participate in the evaluation and decisionmaking process for the purpose of accreditation periodic evaluation of doctoral schools. Art. . The external evaluation for the authorization accreditation and periodic evaluation of a doctoral school will cover in a systemic approach as the case may be the following aspects a the academic relevance of the doctoral school as an.
Entry mechanism including the attractiveness and visibility of the scientific and artistic creationsports performance of the doctoral school expressed by the number of candidates from the country and abroad relative to the number of places offered for competition within the school b institutional capacity as a state mechanism including at least the analysis of the quality of the human resource in the doctoral school by field of the programs and the research infrastructure in the doctoral school c institutional effectiveness as an exit of the human resource generated by the doctoral program and the doctoral schools contribution to scientific knowledgeartistic creationsports performance d quality management as a transversal mechanism including mandatory compliance with ethics integrity and transparency norms and deontological provisions. Art. . The doctoral school and the doctoral supervisor.