Post by account_disabled on Mar 8, 2024 22:29:46 GMT -5
In the opinion of this magistrate, “this approach that I make in said question regarding such a succinct and generic explanation can be taken as a due justification to stop this exoneration . That's what I explain on the body of the car. And from there I ask other questions related to the first, such as whether the justification must be concrete, because here the tax debtor is equated with the debtor for having committed a homicide .
The issue came to Soriano due to a matter related to a natural person who, in the call for bankruptcy proceedings, raised the exoneration of public credit and in the list of creditors a debt was maintained with the Madrid city council of Humanes, which was the holder of a credit. small of about 512.38 euros at the tax level.
“ It is the first case raised where we have taken the Fax Lists opportunity to ask the CJEU five questions so that it can clarify the scenario in which we operate in the future, ” clarifies this jurist, who has ordered that said procedure be suspended and asked the CJEU to process it. by the accelerated procedure.
First reactions
Regarding the first reactions that this publication has surveyed, José María Puelles Valencia , lawyer and bankruptcy administrator, points out that “we receive with notable hope the order dated September 4, 2023 in which, by magistrate Francisco José Soriano, he raises five questions to the CJEU about the exoneration of public credit.”
“Said magistrate had previously issued three orders raising different preliminary questions when he was in the eighth section of the AP of Alicante, as Economist & Jurist already indicated at the time.” In those cases, questions were raised regarding whether or not public credit was exonerable in the Consolidated Text (TR) before the reform of Law 16/2022,” he comments.
The issue came to Soriano due to a matter related to a natural person who, in the call for bankruptcy proceedings, raised the exoneration of public credit and in the list of creditors a debt was maintained with the Madrid city council of Humanes, which was the holder of a credit. small of about 512.38 euros at the tax level.
“ It is the first case raised where we have taken the Fax Lists opportunity to ask the CJEU five questions so that it can clarify the scenario in which we operate in the future, ” clarifies this jurist, who has ordered that said procedure be suspended and asked the CJEU to process it. by the accelerated procedure.
First reactions
Regarding the first reactions that this publication has surveyed, José María Puelles Valencia , lawyer and bankruptcy administrator, points out that “we receive with notable hope the order dated September 4, 2023 in which, by magistrate Francisco José Soriano, he raises five questions to the CJEU about the exoneration of public credit.”
“Said magistrate had previously issued three orders raising different preliminary questions when he was in the eighth section of the AP of Alicante, as Economist & Jurist already indicated at the time.” In those cases, questions were raised regarding whether or not public credit was exonerable in the Consolidated Text (TR) before the reform of Law 16/2022,” he comments.